 |
 |
 |
| Behavioural Cardiology: Co-morbid
Hypertension and Depression |
| T Sachin Deba Singh, T Bihari Singh |
 |
Departments of Cardiology and Psychiattry,
Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manpiur 795004 India |
|
| |
INTRODUCTION |
| |
Behavioral cardiology is an emerging field of clinical
practice based on the recognition that adverse
lifestyle behaviors, emotional factor, and chronic life stress
can all promote atherosclerosis and adverse cardiac events. In
recent years, the pathophysiologic understanding of how psychosocial
risk factors contribute to atherosclerosis and adverse cardiac events
has broadened substantially. There is also increasing evidence that
interventions such as exercise training, multifactorial secondary prevention
efforts that incorporate psychosocial intervention, and antidepressant
medication may be effective in treating psychologic distress and improving
outcomes among patients with cardiac disease1.
Psychosocial factors that
promote atherosclerosis and adverse cardiac
events can be divided into two general categories; emotional factor
and chronic stressors.Emotional factors includes affective disorders
such as major depression and anxiety disorders as well as hostility
and anger. Chronic stressors include factors such as low social support,
low socioeconomic status, work stress, marital stress, and caregiver
strain1.
During the past two decades, a substantial body of evidence has established
a a link between depression, cardiovascular
disease and mortality2,3. Two large , community epidemiologic studies4,5 demonstrated a significant relationship between depression and mortality
in patients with myocardial infarction. Results from another study5,6 showed that depression contributes to a greater chance of developing
or dying of heart disease in persons who were initially healthy,even
after controlling for smoking status, gender,
weight, activity, blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Results from
additional studies2 have supported the contribution of depression as
an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in persons who
were initially free of the disease. Other studies7,8 have shown that
persons who are depressed and have preexisting cardiovascular disease
have a 3.5 times greater risk of dying of a myocardial infarction than
patients with cardiac disease who are not depressed. In a recent study9,
depression was shown to be associated with an increased risk of developing
coronary heart disease in men and women. Depression was shown to increase
mortality related to coronary heart disease in men but had no effect
on mortality in women.
In this review, we look at the links and pathways that make depression
as a risk for hypertension. Also discussed are the implication of such
an association for physicians and cardiologist, and how to aggressively
treat these conditions when they occur together. |
| |
| Table 1. Proposed mechanisms of hypertension in
depression |
| |
| Natural
dysregulation |
Increased
sympathic nervous system activity, exaggerated
cardiovascular reactivity |
Decreased
sensitivity of central alpha2-adrenergic receptors, decreased CNS norepinephrine
activity, loss of circadian rhythm of norepinephrine secretion |
| Hormonal
Dysregulation |
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
axis dysregulation |
Variable
hypersecretion of cortisol, loss of circadian rhythm of ACTH secretion |
| Lifestyle
changes |
Increased
alcohol consumption |
Attempts
to self-medicate and depression, common
predisposition to both disorders (?genetic) |
|
| |
| |
DEPRESSION:
A RISK FACTOR FOR HYPERTENSION |
| |
| Although multiple studies have examined the role of
emotional factors as hostility, aggression, anxiety, and depression
in hypertension, such research has not received much attention. Most
studies of how depression may lead to hypertension have been cross-sectional
or retrospective or small and prospective; they have had limited follow-up
and have produced conflicting results10, 11. Jonas and colleagues12 studied 2,992 normotensive men and women aged 25 to 64 who had no evidence
of hypertension at baseline. The researchers evaluated the link between
anxiety and depression scores at baseline as well as outcomes of both
incident and treated hypertension during the 7 – to 16-year follow-up.
They found that high depression scores were an independent predictor
of hypertension of 1.80 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.78).
In black adults aged 25 to 64, those with high depression scores had
a relative risk of hypertension of 2.99 (95% CI, 1.41-6.33). This analysis
was unique in that a large number of subjects were studied over a long
period. |
| |
| Drugs and Depression |
| |
| Various medications are available to treat both hypertension
and depression. It is important for physicians to be knowledgeable
about the psychiatric side effects of common antihypertensive drugs
and the cardiovascular side effects of certain antidepressants that
may interact adversely with antihypertensive agents. |
| |
| Table 2. Features linking antihypertensive medications
and depression |
| |
| Strength
of evidence |
Antihypertensive
Drugs |
| Considerable
evidence suggesting increased
risk |
Reserpine
and methyldopa |
| Equivocal
evidence of increased risk |
Beta-blockers
(CNS side effects, such as fatigue, insomnia, and nightmares, have
been reported) |
| Report
of CNS side effects but low risk
of true depression |
Clonidine
HCI (CNS side effects, such as sedation, sleep disturbances, and
nightmares, have been reported) |
| Rare
case reports of depression |
Calcium
channel blockers, diuretics ACE inhibitors, hydralazine HCL, Alpha-blockers,
guanethidine monosulfate |
|
| |
| Antihypertensive Drugs and Depression |
| |
A link between antihypertensive medications and depression
has been suspected for more than four decades.
One of the causative pathways for depression
may be the dysregulation of the noradrenergic system. Several commonly
used antihypertensive medications exert their effects through the
sympathetic nervous system and may induce or worsen depression.
Considerable
evidence exists about the ability of reserpine
and methyldopa to cause depression, Reserpine depletes catecholamines
from peripheral sympathetic nerve endings, the brain, and the
adrenal medulla. As a result of norepinephrine
depletion in the CNS, reserpine in doses
greater than 0.25 mg per day can cause clinical depression and a variety
of related side effects, such as decreased energy, crying spells,
lethargy, and insomnia13. Reserpine rarely is used for treatment of
hypertension now that better medications with fewer adverse effects
are available.
Methyldopa
once was widely used as an antihypertensive
medication, but its use has waned in the last two decades. The drug
diminishes central sympathetic outflow, resulting in sedation as its
major side effect and causing depression in 4% to 10% of
patients, especially in higher doses. Patients
who are elderly and those with a history of depression may be more
susceptible to its side effects. Other drugs with similar mechanisms
of action, such as guanethidine monosulfate and clonidine hydrochloride,
often cause sedation and, rarely, clinical depression13.
Beta-blockers
are used for treatment of hypertension as
well as CAD, cardiac arrhythmias, migraine, hyperthyroidism, glaucoma,
and essential tremor. Reports linking depression to propranolol hydrochloride,
which was approved for use in hypertension in 1967, and other beta-blockers
have been inconclusive14, 15. Sedation may occur with all beta-blockers;
insomnia and nightmares have been reported with use of propranolol13.
These symptoms may have been interpreted as depressive symptoms in
some studies, especially in the absence of well-defined criteria for
a diagnosis of depression. Wurzelmann and colleaques14 did not find
increased rates of depression with use of propranolol in a population
of patients aged 75 to 85 years. Some evidence suggests that hydrophilic
beta-blockers, such as atenolol and nadolol, which do not readily
cross the blood-brain barrier, may cause fewer CNS side effects than
other beta-blockers16.
While controversy continues about the association
of beta-blockers and depression, it may be prudent to avoid their use
in hypertensive patients who have received a diagnosis of depression.
Case reports link such drugs as diuretics, calcium channel blockers,
and hydralazine hydrochloride with depression, but evidence supporting
this association is scant. |
| |
DEPRESSION:
A RISK FACTOR FOR HYPERTENSION |
| |
Medications can be an important modifiable factor
in causing or worsening hypertension. The
importance of obtaining a complete history
oh all prescription and nonprescription drugs
cannot be overemphasized; depression is treated
with antidepressants by psychiatrists as well as by primary care physicians.
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) have been known to cause or worsen
hypertension. MAOIs raise blood pressure by delaying the metabolism
of 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) and sympathetic amines, such as
phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride or pseudoephedrine sulfate. These
emergencies have also occurred after ingestion of tyramine-rich foods
and beverages, such as red wine or aged cheese.
Lavin and associates18 reported
a series of 11 cases that suggest MAOIs may
induce spontaneous hypertensive reactions, even in subjects who did
not consume medications or food known to interact with MAOIs. Newer
MAOIs, such as moclobemide, are safer – but not completely
risk-free – with regard to hypertensive reactions19. Although
MAOIs now are raely prescribed, patients
taking these drugs needs blood pressure monitoring
and education about interactions with serotoninergic agents, tyramine-rich
foods, and sympathetic agents.
Tricylic antidepressants (TCAs) are
commonly used in a variety of applications other than depression,
including treatment of migraine and pain
syndromes. TCAs appears to inhibit the reuptake
of norepinephrine centrally and may cause
a mild increase in blood pressure in less
than 5% of patients20. This nonurgent increase in
blood pressure rarely is clinically significant, but patients taking
TCAs needs to have their blood pressure monitored.
More important is
the antagonistic effects of TCAs on alpha-adrenergic
and muscarinic receptors, which may result
in orthostatic blood pressure changes and
small increases in resting heart rate20. These effects assume
greater significance in elderly depressed
patients and in patients treated with antihypertensive
medications, who might be at increased risk of falls because of exaggerated
orthostatic blood pressure changes. This risk appears to be more prominent
with TCAs, such as amitriptyline, desipramine hydrochloride, and imipramine
hydrochloride ; atypical antidepressants,
such as trazodone hydrochloride;and tetracyclic antidepressants,such
as amoxapine and maprotiline hydrochloride..
Although use of TCAs has declined considerably, the safest agent is
the secondary TCA amine nortriptyline hydrochloride13. Arrhythmias
and conduction abnormalities are uncommon with TCAs, but use of these
should be avoided in patients with CAD.
Selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors (SSRIs) produce fewer cardiovascular
and hemodynamic side effects compared with
MAOIs and TCAs. A recent study by Amsterdam
and associates21 of 796 depressed patients treated with 20mg
of fluoxetine hydrochloride per day for up
to 12 weeks show a low rate of sustained
hypertension (1.7% versus 2.1% with placebo).
Role
of SSRIs in Management of Depression with
Hypertension
The safety of SSRIs in hypertensive
patients with depression is a topic of much
interest. SSRIs do not appear to adversely
affect blood pressure or ejection fraction
(EF). One study revealed that despite elevated blood levels
of fluoxetine in depressed patients with
heart disease, no change in blood pressure
was observed22. Similar observations have
been made with sertraline and paroxetine23.The
SSRIs do not possess antiarrhythmic properties
and are unlikely to cause conduction abnormalities,
even in overdose24.
More recently, the safety and efficacy of several
of the SSRIs have been evaluated in patients
with existing ischemic heart disease. Although
the studies have involved a limited number
of patients, the available data25 suggest that SSRIs are not associated
with adverse cardiovascular effects in these
patients and are safer than TCAs in the treatment
of depression in patients with heart disease.
The prevalence of cardiovascular disease
and the evidence that comorbid depression
with cardiovascular disease (for example, following myocardial infarction)
increases the risk of mortality. It also underscores the importance
of understanding the cardiac effects of antidepressants and the need
for effective antidepressants that are free of adverse cardiovascular
effects. At present, the SSRIs should be considered first-line agents
for the treatment of depressed patients with cardiovascular illness,
particularly ischemic heart disease. Among the SSRIs, those with a
lower potential for causing pharmacokinetic drug interactions generally
are preferred. Among the available SSRIs only escitalopram and paroxetine
have been approved in patients with comorbid cardiovascular illness.
Escitalopram
Escitalopram is the first antidepressant
introduced according to chirality rules,
it is an S-enantiomer of citalopram, the
drug which has been used for many years.
Experimental studies showed that the property
of serotonin transporter inhibition – one of
the main mechanisms of antidepressive action
is connected with the S-enantioner of citalopram,
and that escitalopram is the most selective
inhibitor of this transporter. The results
of most clinical studies26 in patients with depression show significant superiority of escitalopram,
10-20 mg/day, over placebo, as early as within the first week of treatment,
and a faster onset of action and higher therapeutic efficacy of escitalopram,
compared to citalopram, 20-40mg/day. A similar efficacy of escitalopram,
10 mg/day, and sertraline 50-200mg/day, as well as escitalopram, 20
mg/day, and venlafaxine, 225mg/day was demonstrated. It has also been
shown that escitalopram, 10-20mg/day, exerts therapeutic efficacy
in general anxiety disorder, panic disorder and social phobia. Escitalopram
may meet many criteria for the optimal antidepressant. The drug is
efficicacious in depressions of various intensity, has a rapid onset
of action and, in long-term treatment, prevents the relapses of the
illness. It exerts therapeutic activity in anxiety disorders. The
dosing is convenient, and the drug is safe and well tolerated due
to a mild profile of side-effects and favorable pharmacokinetic properties.
Cardiovascular
safety of Escitalopram
Cardiac toxicity in
citalopram overdoses appears to be related
to QT prolongation caused by the active metabolite,
didemethylcitalopram(DDCT), which is
present in only minor amounts(<10%)
in humans. Although escitalopram is metabolized.
To S-demethylcitalopram (S-DCT) and S-DDCT, it has been reported
that the level of S-DDCT is not detectable
in most subjects.
Escitalopram was developed specifically to eliminate
side effects due to R-citalopram and to clean
up the pharmacokinetic profile of the parent
drug. Studies of the two enantiomers now indicate
that escitalopram is the most selective SSRI,
and that it is twice as potent as racemic citalopram. I n a review27 of all patients 60 years of age and older who received double-blind
treatment with escitalopram(n = 216) or placebo (N = 214) in five short-term
trials in which there was no dose adjustment for age, nausea and abdominal
pain were the only adverse effects that occurred more freguently than
in the placebo group. There were no laboratory abnormalities or changes
from baseline in vital signs or body weight, and no clinically notable
changes in ECG values, signifying the excellent cardiovascular safety
profile of escitalopram.Cardiac side effects are uncommon w3ith escitalopram
and are generally limited to slight bradycardia
of little clinical significance. |
| |
CONCLUSIONS |
| |
| Scientific evidence has demonstrated that depression
is a risk factor for hypertension. Hypertension can occur as a consequence
of neurohormonal mechanisms or lifestyle changes associated with depressive
disorders.Hypertensive patients with coexisting depression are
at increased risk of adverse outcomes; these patients need to be identified
and both conditions treated aggressively. Escitalopram, an SSRI, was
recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of major depression.
Based on in vitro radioligand binding data, escitalopram is the most
selective SSRI available. Taking into account its excellent safety
profile, it is sure to become the antidepressant of choice in patients
of depression with comorbidities. |
| |
REFERENCES |
| |
| 1. |
Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab PG,
Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial
risk factors in cardiac practice. JACC 2005;3(3):146-160. |
| 2. |
Glassman AH, Shapiro PA. Depression and the course of coronary artery
disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155(1):4-11. |
| 3. |
Musselman DL, Evans DL, Nemeroff CD. The relationship of depression
to cardiovascular disease: epidemiology, biology and treatment . Arch
Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:580-92. |
| 4. |
Murphy JM, Monson RR, Olivier DC, Sobol AM, Leighton AH. Affective
disorders and mortality. A general population study. Arch Gen Psychiatry
1987;44:473-80. |
| 5. |
Bruce ML, Leaf PJ, Rozal GP, Florio L, Hoff RA. Psychiatric status
and 9-year mortality data in the New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area
Study. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:716-21. |
| 6. |
Andra R, Williamson D, Jones D, Macera C, Eaker E, Glassman A, et
al. Depressed affect, hopelessness, and the risk of ischemic heart disease
in a cohort of U.S. adults. Epidemiology 1993;4:285-95. |
| 7. |
Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial
infarction. Impact on 6-month survival. JAMA 1993;270:1819-25. |
| 8. |
Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Talajic M. Major depression before
and after myocardial infarction: its nature and consequences. Psychosom
Med 1996;58:99-110. |
| 9. |
Ferketich AK, Schwartzbaum JA, Frid DJ, Moeschberger ML. Depression
as an antecedent to heart disease among women and man in the NHANES
I study. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern
Med 2000;160:1261-68. |
| 10. |
Bulpitt CJ, Hoffbrand BI, Dollery CT. Psychological features of patients
with hypertension attending follow-up clinics. J Psychosom Res 1976;20(5):403-10. |
| 11. |
Goldberg EL, Comstock GW, Graves CG. Psychological factors and blood
pressure. Psychol Med 1980;10(2):243-55. |
| 12. |
Jonas BS, Franks P, Ingram DD. Are symptoms of anxiety and depression
risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence from the National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6(1):357-60. |
| 13. |
Beers MH, Passman LJ. Antihypertensive medications and depression.
Drugs 1990;40(6):792-99. |
| 14. |
Wurzelman J, Frishman WH, Aronson M, et al. Neuropsychological effects
of antihypertensive drugs. Cardiol Clin 1987;5(4)689-701. |
| 15. |
Avorn J, Everitt DE, Weiss S. Increased antidepressant use in patients
prescribed beta-blockers. JAMA 1998:255(3):357-60. |
| 16. |
Conant J, Engler R, Janowsky D, et al. Central nervous system side
effects of beta-adrenergic blocking agents with high and low lipid solubility.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989;13(4):656-61. |
| 17. |
Clyburn EB, Dipette DJ. Hypertension induced by drugs and other substances.Semin
Nephrol 1995;15(2):72-86. |
| 18. |
Lavin MR, Mendelowitz A, Kronig MH. Spontaneous hypertensive reactions
with monamine oxidase inhibitors. Biol Psychiatry 1993;34(3):146-51. |
| 19. |
Coulter DM, Pillans PI. Hypertension with moclobemide. (Letter) Lancet
1995;346(8981):1032. |
| 20. |
Goldman LS, Alexander RC, Luchins DJ. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
and tricyclic antidepressants: comparison of their cardiovascular effects.
J Clin Psychiatry 1986;47(5):225-29. |
| 21. |
Amsterdam JD, Garcia-Espana F, Fawcett J, et al. Blood pressure changes
during short-term fluoxetine treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1999;19(1):9-14. |
| 22. |
Roose SP, et al. Cardiovascular effects of fluoxetine in depressed
patients with heart disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998 May;155(5):660-65. |
| 23. |
Roose SP, et al. Comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed
patients with ischemic heart disease. JAMA 1998;279:287-91. |
| 24. |
Glassman AH. Citalopram toxicity. Lancet 1997;350:818. |
| 25. |
Glassman AH. Cardiovascular effects of antidepressant drugs: updated.
J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59 Suppl 15:13-8. |
| 26. |
Rybakowski J, Borkowska AB. Escitalopram – second generation
of serotonin transporter inhibitors? Psychiatr Pol 2004;38(2):227-39. |
| 27. |
Burke WJ. Escitalopram. Expert Opin Investing Drugs 2002 Oct;11(10):1477-86. |
|
| |
| Correspondence: Dr T Sachin Deba Singh, Assistant Professor
Cardiology, Sagolband Meino Leirak, Imphal, Manipur 795001 India. |
|
|
 |
|
|